Less re-entry
Structured exchanges replace critical manual transfers.
Capabilities EDI, API & integrations
Capability · EDI, API & integrations
Make data flow.Preserve business meaning.
Map responsibilities, choose the right exchange mode, secure recovery and connect every technical incident to its operational impact.
A capability shaped by your flows, rules and field evidence.
01 / 0302 / 0303 / 03
Explainable flows
Producer, consumer, rule and frequency are documented.
Controlled recovery
Reject, duplicate, delay and outage follow a clear process.
Governed evolution
Version, compatibility, test and deployment are managed by contract.
Decision framework
Connect promise, responsibility and proof.
Good integration does not merely move fields. It protects the source of truth, business timing, idempotency, recovery and ownership.
Gaps to eliminate
What weakens day-to-day decisions.
Each gap connects an observable situation to a business consequence. Diagnosis then verifies frequency, impact and cause.
Ambiguous source of truth
Two systems change the same data without arbitration.
Conflict and silent overwriteFile without contract
Format, frequency and rule change without version.
Error discovered during operationsDecorative real time
The flow is fast but confirms neither order nor processing.
False status and duplicatesTechnical-only monitoring
The HTTP error is visible, not the affected order or mission.
Business prioritisation impossibleOperational journey
A chain of decisions, not a stack of screens.
Each transition identifies the participant, responsible system and expected proof.
1
Map
Name producers and consumers
Object, source, owner, event and use are documented.
- Owner
- Architecture / business
- Proof
- Flow matrix
2
Contract
Define meaning and quality
Schema, rule, key, version, frequency, acknowledgement and error are specified.
- Owner
- IT / data owners
- Proof
- Testable contract
3
Connect
Choose the right mechanism
API, EDI, event, file or database are selected based on need and risk.
- Owner
- Integration
- Proof
- Secure versioned flow
4
Operate
Monitor and recover
Availability, latency, rejection, duplicate and recovery are linked to business.
- Owner
- Run / support
- Proof
- Actionable incident
5
Evolve
Change without breaking
Compatibility, tests, window, rollback and deprecation are planned.
- Owner
- Product / architecture
- Proof
- Adopted version
Decision lab
Change context. Follow what genuinely needs to happen.
These scenarios are illustrative: they show decision logic and responsibilities without claiming to simulate your actual outcomes.
EDI order
Accept an order only when it is usable
A partner sends a message with an unknown reference.
Reject or hold with reason, owner and partner feedback.
Message, error and resolution linked to order.
B‑AGILEdecision flowSystème producteurCouche d’intégrationSystème consommateurSupervisionData governance
WMS-TMS event
Plan only a genuinely ready shipment
WMS confirms a partial wave with revised weight.
Update shipment and mission without creating a duplicate.
Version, acknowledgement and consequences visible.
B‑AGILEdecision flowSystème producteurCouche d’intégrationSystème consommateurSupervisionData governance
API unavailable
Maintain operations in degraded mode
A third-party service becomes unavailable during cutoff.
Switch to queue, recovery or controlled manual procedure based on criticality.
Pending transactions, recovery and reconciliation recorded.
B‑AGILEdecision flowSystème producteurCouche d’intégrationSystème consommateurSupervisionData governance
Responsibility architecture
Unify the flow without pretending one system does everything.
The responsibilities below form a reference architecture to adapt to the existing IT landscape.
Système producteur
Carries the fact- Owns
- Object, event, order and source quality
- Publishes
- Versioned message
Couche d’intégration
Carries transport- Owns
- Routing, transformation, security, acknowledgement and recovery
- Publishes
- Contextualised technical status
Système consommateur
Carries processing- Owns
- Business validation, write and result
- Publishes
- Accepted, rejected or processed
Supervision
Carries service- Owns
- Availability, latency, error, backlog and SLA
- Publishes
- Incident and impact
Data governance
Carries trust- Owns
- Definition, ownership, lineage, retention and access
- Publishes
- Rule and audit
Actionable cockpit
Living exchange map
For each flow: who produces, who consumes, at which event, at what frequency, with which confirmation and degraded mode.
- Useful successAvoid confusing technical transport with outcome
- Business latencyConnect frequency and decision window
- BacklogPrioritise before saturation
- RecoveryVerify actual resilience
Operational view · example
Ambiguous source of truthFile without contractDecorative real time
Success conditions
What must be true before automation.
Contract per flow
Object, schema, rule, key, version, frequency, error and acknowledgement are explicit.
Proportionate security
Identity, encryption, rights, secrets, logging and retention match risk.
Idempotency and recovery
A repeat does not create a duplicate; an interruption can be reconciled.
Real catalogue
Each connector is confirmed by vendor, version, object and scenario; no universal connector is assumed.
Related B‑AGILE solutions
Compose the right scope.
A capability may be carried by a full suite, a standalone solution or an existing system. Diagnosis decides.
Suites
Suites EMS
Share native integration capabilities between their authorised components.
Explore SolutionPROTECH WMS
Exposes and consumes orders, master data, stock and logistics events.
Explore SolutionCANDOR TMS
Exposes and consumes requirements, missions, milestones, proof and transport costs.
Explore SolutionESSOR ERP
Carries master data and management records to synchronise.
ExploreGo further
Content to prepare a real discussion.
Frequently asked questions
Decide with the right boundaries.
Are all connectors native?
No. Standard connectors exist, but coverage must be confirmed by vendor, version, object and flow.
When should API, EDI or file be used?
Based on volume, frequency, event, partner maturity, security, acknowledgement, recovery and operating cost.
How are duplicates avoided?
With business keys, message identifiers, idempotency rules, acknowledgements and reconciliation.
Can existing files be retained?
Yes if format, quality, frequency, security, ownership and recovery procedure are documented.
How is an outage managed?
With queues, controlled retries, degraded mode, business alert, recovery and post-service reconciliation.
Who owns the data?
The system and business owner defined in the contract; the integration layer does not automatically become source of truth.
Your context first
Connect your systems without diluting their responsibilities.
Identify the decisions, data, responsibilities and pilot that will deliver observable value.