End-to-end visibility
Events are connected to the relevant record, site, product and decision.

Capability · Data & decision
Unify useful events, qualify their freshness and turn every signal into a decision, action and proof—at the actual pace of your operations.
A capability shaped by your flows, rules and field evidence.
Events are connected to the relevant record, site, product and decision.
Definitions, rules and priorities remain consistent across cockpit, alert and analysis.
An alert states the gap, impact, owner and action still possible.
Each decision retains the data, assumptions and actions that shaped it.
Decision framework
Real time is not a universal frequency. It is defined by the window in which information can still change a decision, with an explicit source, acceptable age and degraded mode.
Gaps to eliminate
Each gap connects an observable situation to a business consequence. Diagnosis then verifies frequency, impact and cause.
ERP, WMS, TMS, IoT and files describe the same flow with different keys.
View rebuilt too lateA dashboard shows a status without saying when or how it was updated.
Decision based on stale informationService, margin, inventory or delay do not mean the same thing across teams.
Reconciliation meetingsThe signal informs but specifies no priority, owner or closure.
Noise and alert fatigueThe aggregate indicator cannot trace records, causes and decisions.
Slow, contested actionOperational journey
Each transition identifies the participant, responsible system and expected proof.
Collect
Standardise
Unify
Analyse
Decide
Decision lab
These scenarios are illustrative: they show decision logic and responsibilities without claiming to simulate your actual outcomes.
Transport
ETA and congestion put a priority delivery at risk.
Compare waiting, resequencing, transfer or customer information according to impact.
Selected option, owner, revised ETA and impacted customer.
Warehouse
Remaining workload, resource availability and cut-off time diverge.
Rebalance priorities, areas or resources according to promised service.
Changed plan, affected orders and wave outcome visible.
Industry
Cycle, scrap or downtime deviates from the route and agreed threshold.
Qualify material, machine, setting, team or quality before resuming.
Cause, action, batch and restart conditions connected.
Commerce
Demand, reservations and promiseable stock create a local shortage.
Arbitrate transfer, allocation, substitution or a new promise according to rules.
Decision, quantity, site and affected customers recorded.
Sustainability
Energy consumption deviates from the expected level for the output produced.
Distinguish workload, downtime, equipment drift or operating rule.
Contextualised gap, action and comparison period retained.
Responsibility architecture
The responsibilities below form a reference architecture to adapt to the existing IT landscape.
Actionable cockpit
The cockpit starts with decisions to make: it shows situation, freshness, gap, accessible cause and action—then drills down to the source record.
Success conditions
Each critical event specifies frequency, acceptable age and enabled action.
Indicators and statuses have a formula, source, owner, version and quality rules.
The aggregate view can trace transformation, event and source record.
An alert is useful only when action, owner and proof return to the loop.
Related B‑AGILE solutions
A capability may be carried by a full suite, a standalone solution or an existing system. Diagnosis decides.
Connect events across logistics, industrial, commercial and agricultural branches.
Explore SolutionCarries master data, commitments, management and financial context.
Explore SolutionStructures transport, cost, margin and performance analytics within the confirmed scope.
Explore CapabilityPublishes events, controls exchange contracts and monitors recovery.
ExploreGo further
Frequently asked questions
No. Frequency is chosen by decision, criticality, cost and response capability. Faster data without a possible action does not create value.
Not necessarily. A responsibility model, exchange contracts and shared definitions are required across the selected components.
BI structures analysis, history and management. Operational analytics adds freshness, events, the decision window and the action loop. They complement each other.
By connecting each alert to a rule, impact, owner, possible action and closure condition, then reviewing observed noise.
Yes, if their role, data, frequency, quality and interface are compatible with the chosen decision flow.
No. Visual examples are illustrative. Actual definitions and views are built around your scope and authorised data.
Your context first
Identify the decisions, data, responsibilities and pilot that will deliver observable value.