Carrier guide

Manage transport operations without separating service, fleet and profitability

Connect order, planning, driver, vehicle, assignment, incident, evidence, cost and invoicing.

For: Carrier executives, operations, fleet, finance, sales and IT
01 · Short answer

What to clarify before discussing a solution

The signal

Service is tracked by operations, cost by finance and fleet availability in a third system.

The answer

Which work unit explains profitability without losing the reality of routes and disruption?

The answer does not lie in an isolated feature: it is built by connecting rules, actors, data and evidence.
The expected outcome

A management model by assignment and route, connecting commitment, resources, evidence and contribution.

02 · Structural decisions

Four decisions to make before configuration

These decisions make the scope testable and prevent structural choices from being discovered during the project.

01

Define the profitability work unit

The decision must specify the rule, its owner, the required data and the evidence used to accept it.

02

Connect vehicle availability and planning

The decision must specify the rule, its owner, the required data and the evidence used to accept it.

03

Structure incident reasons and waiting time

The decision must specify the rule, its owner, the required data and the evidence used to accept it.

04

Close assignment, evidence and invoicing in the same flow

The decision must specify the rule, its owner, the required data and the evidence used to accept it.

03 · Scope

A readable end-to-end flow

Scope is not a list of modules. It is a chain of events, ownership and decisions.

1Order and commitment
2Resource planning
3Driver assignment
4Fleet and availability
5Evidence, cost and invoicing

In the first scoping

  • One representative flow and its useful variants
  • Authoritative events and minimum data
  • Roles, decisions and escalation times
  • Acceptance criteria and baseline measurement

To sequence in waves

  • Additional sites, activities or populations
  • Rare variants that do not condition the pilot
  • Automations whose rule is not yet stable
  • Advanced dashboards after source reliability

To decide explicitly

  • Define the profitability work unit
  • Connect vehicle availability and planning
  • Structure incident reasons and waiting time
  • Close assignment, evidence and invoicing in the same flow
04 · Roadmap

From direction to measured improvement

  1. 1Navigator
  2. 2Personalised review
  3. 3Scoping workshop
  4. 4Wave-based deployment
  5. 5KPI measurement

Each stage produces a decision or evidence reusable in the next. Deployment remains business-led and verifiable.

05 · Metrics

Measure to decide, not to fill a dashboard

Every KPI needs a definition, a source, a cadence and an associated decision.

KPIFormulaSourceDecision
Transport cost per unitConsolidated transport costs ÷ units deliveredServices, kilometres, charges and invoicingArbitrate transport plan, utilisation and providers
Empty kilometresUnladen kilometres ÷ total kilometresRoutes, geolocation and assignmentsRedesign routes and trip chaining
Complete delivery evidenceDeliveries with usable evidence ÷ closed deliveriesPOD, statuses, reservations and documentsReduce disputes and accelerate closure
Contribution marginRevenue − directly attributable costsSales, purchasing, operations and chargesArbitrate portfolio, service and terms
06 · Business scenario

A route explained from plan to margin

Situation
A carrier maintains service but struggles to explain contribution variance across comparable routes.
Approach
The pilot connects assignments, kilometres, time, incidents, evidence and billable items to the same work unit.
Target outcome
Operations can act on the operating causes of profitability.
This scenario illustrates a scoping method. Outcomes must be established with data from the selected scope.
07 · Frequently asked questions

Useful answers before the first discussion

01Where should we start in practical terms?

Choose a representative scope spanning “Order and commitment” and “Resource planning”, then document one normal case and one frequent exception. The first flow should be important enough to matter but contained enough to observe end to end.

02Do all existing systems need replacing?

No. Scoping starts with decisions, authoritative events and ownership. It then determines what should be retained, integrated, replaced or simply better governed, wave by wave.

03What data should be prepared before a workshop?

Prepare a few real cases, the volumes shaping the operation, the main variance reasons and the sources used to measure Transport cost per unit. The quality of examples matters more than the quantity of documents.

04How should the right pilot scope be chosen?

Choose a scope with an available owner, accessible data, a meaningful exception and a measurable outcome. Avoid both an overly simple case that proves nothing and an overly broad scope that dilutes learning.

05How can scope changes during the project be limited?

Make assumptions, interfaces, variants, exceptions and acceptance criteria explicit. Every new request can then be classified: essential to the wave, suitable for a later wave, or outside the objective. Discussion focuses on impact rather than intuition.

Next step

Turn this guide into a personalised review

Complete Navigator to position your context, then use the review as the starting point for a scoping workshop.

  1. 1Navigator
  2. 2Personalised review
  3. 3Scoping workshop
  4. 4Wave-based deployment
  5. 5KPI measurement
NavigatorPlan a discussion with an expert