Controlled availability
Preventive work, failure and operating constraints share one calendar.
Capabilities Asset maintenance
Capability · Asset maintenance
Stop managing interventions alone.Manage asset reliability.
Connect criticality, preventive work, requests, work orders, skills, parts, downtime and feedback to decide at the right level.
A capability shaped by your flows, rules and field evidence.
01 / 0302 / 0303 / 03
Prepared intervention
Skill, part, procedure, permit and window are qualified before dispatch.
Usable history
Cause, action, time, consumption and result are structured.
Visible risk
Criticality and trend guide priorities rather than request volume.
Decision framework
Connect promise, responsibility and proof.
CMMS becomes useful when each intervention supports a better decision about the asset, risk, part and maintenance plan.
Gaps to eliminate
What weakens day-to-day decisions.
Each gap connects an observable situation to a business consequence. Diagnosis then verifies frequency, impact and cause.
Incomplete register
Equipment, subassembly, location and criticality are not aligned.
Unusable historyCalendar-only preventive
Plans ignore usage, condition or risk.
Over-maintenance or avoidable failureUnprepared intervention
Technician, part or permit is missing at the critical moment.
Extended downtimePoor feedback
Work order closes without cause, measurement or lasting action.
Recurring failuresOperational journey
A chain of decisions, not a stack of screens.
Each transition identifies the participant, responsible system and expected proof.
1
Criticality
Structure the asset base
Hierarchy, location, use, redundancy and impact are qualified.
- Owner
- OTILA / business
- Proof
- Validated asset and criticality
2
Prevent
Build the plan
Time, meter, condition and regulation trigger the right plans.
- Owner
- OTILA CMMS
- Proof
- Plan and next due dates
3
Prepare
Make work executable
Skill, availability, part, tooling, procedure and safety are brought together.
- Owner
- Maintenance planning
- Proof
- Work order ready to release
4
Intervene
Guide and prove
Diagnosis, time, action, measurement, photo and consumption are returned.
- Owner
- Technician / provider
- Proof
- Work and return to service
5
Improve reliability
Turn feedback into a decision
Recurrence, cause, cost and risk revise plan, stock or design.
- Owner
- Reliability / BI
- Proof
- Assigned lasting action
Decision lab
Change context. Follow what genuinely needs to happen.
These scenarios are illustrative: they show decision logic and responsibilities without claiming to simulate your actual outcomes.
Line failure
Reduce time lost before intervention
A critical asset stops with a known code.
Qualify criticality, history, skill and part before assignment.
Diagnosis, work order and technician ETA visible.
B‑AGILEdecision flowOTILA GMAOERP / achatsMES / exploitationWMS
Opportunistic preventive
Use a window without disrupting the plan
A line stops earlier than planned due to material shortage.
Compare ready work, duration, risk and parts availability.
Grouped work and updated plan.
B‑AGILEdecision flowOTILA GMAOERP / achatsMES / exploitationWMS
Service provider
Control external work end to end
A contracted asset needs specialist work.
Share scope, access, SLA, proof and service approval.
Service, parts, time and acceptance reconciled.
B‑AGILEdecision flowOTILA GMAOERP / achatsMES / exploitationWMS
Responsibility architecture
Unify the flow without pretending one system does everything.
The responsibilities below form a reference architecture to adapt to the existing IT landscape.
OTILA GMAO
Carries maintenance- Owns
- Assets, plans, requests, WOs, parts and history
- Publishes
- Due dates, work and availability
ERP / achats
Carries management- Owns
- Suppliers, orders, contracts, costs and fixed assets
- Publishes
- Commitment and valuation
MES / exploitation
Carries field context- Owns
- State, meter, stop, production and window
- Publishes
- Event and availability
WMS
Carries parts- Owns
- Stock, lot, location, reservation and movement
- Publishes
- Part availability
Actionable cockpit
Reliability & execution cockpit
Priorities combine criticality, risk, production, resource availability and feedback quality.
- AvailabilityConnect maintenance to delivered service
- MTTRTarget the phase extending downtime
- On-time preventiveAvoid a flattering but useless rate
- RecurrencePrioritise lasting improvement
Operational view · example
Incomplete registerCalendar-only preventiveUnprepared intervention
Success conditions
What must be true before automation.
Explicit scope
Activities, sites, participants, systems and boundaries are defined before any automation.
Named responsibilities
Each data item, rule, decision and exception has a business owner and responsible system.
Observable proof
An action is only treated as complete after verifiable feedback from the field or execution system.
Before / after measurement
A baseline, indicator, horizon and interpretation limits are agreed before the pilot.
Related B‑AGILE solutions
Compose the right scope.
A capability may be carried by a full suite, a standalone solution or an existing system. Diagnosis decides.
Solution
OTILA GMAO
Structures assets, preventive work, interventions, resources, parts and history.
Explore SuiteEMS Industrie
Connects maintenance, production, materials and industrial performance.
Explore SolutionPROTECH WMS
Makes parts stock, reservation and consumption reliable.
Explore SolutionESSOR ERP
Connects purchasing, suppliers, costs and fixed assets.
ExploreGo further
Content to prepare a real discussion.
Frequently asked questions
Decide with the right boundaries.
Must existing systems be replaced?
Not necessarily. Scoping distinguishes what should be retained, connected, extended or replaced based on value, risk and expected responsibility.
Can we start with a limited scope?
Yes. One flow, one site and a few critical decisions can test data, rules, interfaces and adoption before extension.
How is real time defined?
By the decision window. Each event must specify its source, frequency, acceptable age and degraded mode.
Are outcomes guaranteed?
No. Benefits are measured against an agreed baseline, scope and period; no generic percentage is promised.
How are exchanges secured?
Through suitable architecture, role-based rights, logging, retention rules and risk-proportionate monitoring.
Who approves business rules?
Named business owners, with IT and execution teams contributing; overrides remain traceable.
Your context first
Move from reactive maintenance to managed reliability.
Identify the decisions, data, responsibilities and pilot that will deliver observable value.