Capabilities Operational traceability

Capability · Operational traceability

Retrieve the useful history.Decide without rebuilding the flow.

Connect identity, lot, movement, transformation, participant, document, status and proof to answer forward and backward questions quickly.

A capability shaped by your flows, rules and field evidence.

Food lotActive scenario01SignalA quality result challenges a material lot.02DecisionIdentify outputs, stock, shipments and affected customers.03ProofScope, block and communication reconciled.04Active systemERP05Active systemMES
01 / 03Find every destination within minutes
Industrial componentActive scenario01SignalA defect is linked to a serial range and workstation.02DecisionTrace materials, orders, stations, operators and delivered products.03ProofExact population and disposition decision.04Active systemERP05Active systemMES
02 / 03Isolate a serial range without stopping all production
Delivery proofActive scenario01SignalA customer reports damage on a partial delivery.02DecisionReconcile order, parcel, pallet, mission, photo and reservation.03ProofResponsibility and next action documented.04Active systemOMS05Active systemWMS
03 / 03Connect the reservation to the right parcel and lot
01 / 0302 / 0303 / 03
01

Controlled scope

Lot, serial, logistics unit or asset is unambiguously identified.

02

Fast search

Origin, transformations, destinations and documents are linked.

03

Targeted block

A quality alert isolates the right scope without stopping the entire flow.

04

Usable proof

Control, release, shipment and receipt retain their participant and date.

Decision framework

Connect promise, responsibility and proof.

Traceability is not merely recording events. It must identify an exact scope, explain its history and trigger action.

Business logic

Decisions start with explicit rules.

Connected architecture

Clear responsibilities, from signal to proof.

ERPCarries master dataMES / industrieCarries transformationPROTECH WMSCarries physical flowCANDOR TMSCarries deliveryQualitéCarries the decision

Gaps to eliminate

What weakens day-to-day decisions.

Each gap connects an observable situation to a business consequence. Diagnosis then verifies frequency, impact and cause.

01

Multiple identifiers

Item, lot, parcel, pallet, order and mission do not reconcile.

Manual search and uncertain scope
02

Transformation break

Consumption and produced items lose lineage.

Origin or destination cannot be found
03

Ungoverned status

Blocked, released, inspected or destroyed do not mean the same thing.

Stock falsely promised
04

Isolated document

Certificate, photo, POD or analysis remains in a separate folder.

Proof slow to consolidate

Operational journey

A chain of decisions, not a stack of screens.

Each transition identifies the participant, responsible system and expected proof.

1

Identify

Give a stable identity

Item, lot, serial, unit, asset and document follow uniqueness rules.
Owner
Master data / ERP
Proof
Controlled identity
2

Capture

Timestamp the right event

Receipt, movement, consumption, control, shipping and delivery record participant and context.
Owner
WMS / MES / TMS
Proof
Sourced event
3

Connect

Preserve lineage

Inputs, transformation, outputs, grouping and splitting are reconciled.
Owner
ERP / MES / data
Proof
Backward and forward genealogy
4

Decide

Block, release or recall

Scope, reason, authority and action are applied to relevant systems.
Owner
Quality / operations
Proof
Decision distributed and acknowledged
5

Prove

Return the history

Events, documents, results and decisions form an explainable record.
Owner
Data / audit
Proof
Timestamped exportable record

Decision lab

Change context. Follow what genuinely needs to happen.

These scenarios are illustrative: they show decision logic and responsibilities without claiming to simulate your actual outcomes.

Food lot

Find every destination within minutes

Signal

A quality result challenges a material lot.

Decision

Identify outputs, stock, shipments and affected customers.

Expected proof

Scope, block and communication reconciled.

B‑AGILEdecision flowERPMES / industriePROTECH WMSCANDOR TMSQualité

Responsibility architecture

Unify the flow without pretending one system does everything.

The responsibilities below form a reference architecture to adapt to the existing IT landscape.

01

ERP

Carries master data
Owns
Item, expected lot, order, supplier and customer
Publishes
Management context
02

MES / industrie

Carries transformation
Owns
Inputs, consumption, parameters, results and outputs
Publishes
Production lineage
03

PROTECH WMS

Carries physical flow
Owns
Receipt, location, status, movement, picking and shipping
Publishes
Location and logistics genealogy
04

CANDOR TMS

Carries delivery
Owns
Mission, milestones, documents and POD
Publishes
Destination and proof
05

Qualité

Carries the decision
Owns
Control, block, release, override and recall
Publishes
Status and scope

Actionable cockpit

Genealogy explorer

Search starts from a lot, serial, order, unit or customer and returns events, lineage, stock and proof.

  • Search timeMeasure actual response capability
  • CoverageSee breaks in the chain
  • Orphan eventsPrioritise data quality
  • Decision timeReduce exposure and immobilisation
Operational view · example
Search time01Trigger to validated scope
Coverage02Stages and populations with usable identity
Orphan events03Unreconciled movements or documents
Decision time04Scope identified to acknowledged action
Multiple identifiersTransformation breakUngoverned status
No value is a customer measurement. Illustrative functional example.

Success conditions

What must be true before automation.

01

Explicit scope

Activities, sites, participants, systems and boundaries are defined before any automation.

02

Named responsibilities

Each data item, rule, decision and exception has a business owner and responsible system.

03

Observable proof

An action is only treated as complete after verifiable feedback from the field or execution system.

04

Before / after measurement

A baseline, indicator, horizon and interpretation limits are agreed before the pilot.

Go further

Content to prepare a real discussion.

View all resources

Frequently asked questions

Decide with the right boundaries.

Must existing systems be replaced?

Not necessarily. Scoping distinguishes what should be retained, connected, extended or replaced based on value, risk and expected responsibility.

Can we start with a limited scope?

Yes. One flow, one site and a few critical decisions can test data, rules, interfaces and adoption before extension.

How is real time defined?

By the decision window. Each event must specify its source, frequency, acceptable age and degraded mode.

Are outcomes guaranteed?

No. Benefits are measured against an agreed baseline, scope and period; no generic percentage is promised.

How are exchanges secured?

Through suitable architecture, role-based rights, logging, retention rules and risk-proportionate monitoring.

Who approves business rules?

Named business owners, with IT and execution teams contributing; overrides remain traceable.

Your context first

Make every flow retrievable, explainable and actionable.

Identify the decisions, data, responsibilities and pilot that will deliver observable value.

Talk to an expert All capabilities