
One shared asset identity.
Sites, equipment, structures, items and cost centres are reconciled without creating competing truths.


OTILA CMMS · EDI
Exchange assets, requests, work orders, parts, purchasing and costs with the applications that own them.
Every exchange preserves its operational meaning and ownership, from asset to cost.
Integration that protects operations
The module connects maintenance data to the system that truly owns it. Every flow keeps an explicit identifier, update rule and exception path.

Sites, equipment, structures, items and cost centres are reconciled without creating competing truths.

Requests, work orders, reservations, purchasing and closure events move at the useful rhythm with their business status.

Technical errors, incomplete data and business exceptions are separated, assigned and recovered with their history.
The operational journey
Explore each stage: actions, information and expected evidence stay connected in the same business record.
Identifiers and sources of truth definedStage 01 · Reference
Align sites, equipment, items, suppliers and cost centres.
Decision lab
Each scenario exposes the required decision, responsible system and evidence to retain before an interface is approved.

Two applications know the same equipment through different structures and update rhythms.
Name the source of truth, define the matching key and separate creation, enrichment and deactivation.
Shared identifier, owner for every field, timestamp and update log.
What the capability changes
Assets and associated resources remain identifiable across systems.
Approved needs follow a clear path to ERP or purchasing.
Parts, time and services can feed the economic analysis.
Integration by design
The systems shown describe exchanges to assess; they are not a list of native connectors. Data contracts and responsibilities are approved during scoping.
Information-system boundaries
The EDI module moves and monitors exchanges; it does not turn OTILA into an ERP, WMS, purchasing tool or IoT platform.
Go further
Content connected to scoping, data and operational decisions.
Scoping questions
The final scope depends on your architecture, responsibilities and required evidence.
The mechanism depends on each system’s APIs, formats, volumes, security and responsibilities.
Yes, after defining the source of truth, identifiers and create/update rules.
No. Every connector, version, protocol and scope must be confirmed with the relevant system before commitment.
Scoping defines criticality, alert, owner, recovery, resolution time and outcome control for every flow.
A source of truth must be assigned by object or field, with documented enrichment rights and synchronisation rules.
Start from your context
Navigator prepares the diagnostic. A B‑AGILE expert then turns the context into a decision path.