Connect maintenance to the IS.
OTILA CMMS

OTILA CMMS · EDI

Connect maintenance to the IS.
Avoid another re-entry point.

Exchange assets, requests, work orders, parts, purchasing and costs with the applications that own them.

Every exchange preserves its operational meaning and ownership, from asset to cost.

Integration that protects operations

Three continuities to design—not another stack of interfaces.

The module connects maintenance data to the system that truly owns it. Every flow keeps an explicit identifier, update rule and exception path.

Digital flows connecting operational systems
02 · Operational flows

A request becomes a tracked action.

Requests, work orders, reservations, purchasing and closure events move at the useful rhythm with their business status.

Operations station monitoring industrial events and exceptions
03 · Monitoring

No rejected message disappears silently.

Technical errors, incomplete data and business exceptions are separated, assigned and recovered with their history.

The operational journey

Three stages. One continuous flow.

Explore each stage: actions, information and expected evidence stay connected in the same business record.

Illustration: Reference Identifiers and sources of truth defined

Stage 01 · Reference

A shared asset identity

Align sites, equipment, items, suppliers and cost centres.

  • Useful information in context
  • Clearly assigned responsibility
  • History and evidence retained
01 / 03

Decision lab

Test the architecture against the situations that really challenge it.

Each scenario exposes the required decision, responsible system and evidence to retain before an interface is approved.

Maintenance planning connected to the asset master
01 / 04

Equipment is created in the ERP but must be maintained in OTILA.

Situation

Two applications know the same equipment through different structures and update rhythms.

Decision to design

Name the source of truth, define the matching key and separate creation, enrichment and deactivation.

Expected evidence

Shared identifier, owner for every field, timestamp and update log.

What the capability changes

Outcomes that field teams and management can understand.

01

Consistent master data

Assets and associated resources remain identifiable across systems.

02

Smoother purchasing

Approved needs follow a clear path to ERP or purchasing.

03

Reconciled costs

Parts, time and services can feed the economic analysis.

Integration by design

The module fits into your ecosystem.

The systems shown describe exchanges to assess; they are not a list of native connectors. Data contracts and responsibilities are approved during scoping.

Security, rights, monitoring and recovery are addressed for every flow.
B‑AGILEbusiness capabilityOTILA GMAOERPPurchasingStocks MROIoTData

Information-system boundaries

Reliable flows start with unambiguous responsibility.

The EDI module moves and monitors exchanges; it does not turn OTILA into an ERP, WMS, purchasing tool or IoT platform.

01Maintenance

OTILA CMMS

Owns
Maintained assets, requests, plans, work orders, consumption, evidence and maintenance history.
Exchanges
Master data, requirements, statuses, costs and qualified events.
02Management & execution

ERP · Purchasing · Inventory

Owns
Suppliers, orders, commitments, accounting and physical movements under the selected architecture.
Exchanges
Approved requests, availability, receipts, valuations and statuses.
03Transport & monitoring

Integration layer

Owns
Mapping, security, routing, versioning, logs, recovery and message observability.
Exchanges
Data without taking ownership of the source system’s business decision.

Scoping questions

What must be clarified before deciding.

The final scope depends on your architecture, responsibilities and required evidence.

Which interfaces are available?

The mechanism depends on each system’s APIs, formats, volumes, security and responsibilities.

Can equipment be synchronised?

Yes, after defining the source of truth, identifiers and create/update rules.

Are all connectors native?

No. Every connector, version, protocol and scope must be confirmed with the relevant system before commitment.

How can a rejected exchange avoid blocking operations?

Scoping defines criticality, alert, owner, recovery, resolution time and outcome control for every flow.

What if two systems claim ownership of the same data?

A source of truth must be assigned by object or field, with documented enrichment rights and synchronisation rules.

Start from your context

Validate the value, interfaces and right scope.

Navigator prepares the diagnostic. A B‑AGILE expert then turns the context into a decision path.

Launch Navigator Talk to an expert